<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Redefining the Alpha Male</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodmenfoundation.org/blog/2009/12/redefining-the-alpha-male/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodmenfoundation.org/blog/2009/12/redefining-the-alpha-male/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 03:23:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: shimioshiba</title>
		<link>http://goodmenfoundation.org/blog/2009/12/redefining-the-alpha-male/comment-page-1/#comment-1470</link>
		<dc:creator>shimioshiba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 03:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodmenbook.org/blog/?p=2869#comment-1470</guid>
		<description>What words...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What words&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Phoenix</title>
		<link>http://goodmenfoundation.org/blog/2009/12/redefining-the-alpha-male/comment-page-1/#comment-1444</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Phoenix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 23:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodmenbook.org/blog/?p=2869#comment-1444</guid>
		<description>Tom, great post. It&#039;s the first I have read that looks sensible at the con cept of Alpha male. There are too many people out there promoting the concept of Alpha Male as aggressive and the one who wins. I agree with your comment at the end, I would be an alphs in that definition. The problem is that I don&#039;t think we are going to change the definition of the term, we need a new one. I am toying with the concept of a &#039;Re-Awakened Man&#039;, any thoughts on this? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, great post. It&#39;s the first I have read that looks sensible at the con cept of Alpha male. There are too many people out there promoting the concept of Alpha Male as aggressive and the one who wins. I agree with your comment at the end, I would be an alphs in that definition. The problem is that I don&#39;t think we are going to change the definition of the term, we need a new one. I am toying with the concept of a &#39;Re-Awakened Man&#39;, any thoughts on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
